In case you don't feel like reading the whole story...in a nutshell, a MO man who was convicted of armed robbery was sentenced to 13 years in prison (13-14 years ago), posted bond during the appeals process and was told to await law enforcement on a date to begin serving his sentence. They never showed up due to a "clerical error." So fast forward 13 years, the guy got married, started a successful business, was involved in church, coaching sports, was raising a family (4 kids), basically a productive member of society during this time, but never called attention to the fact that he hadn't been called to serve his sentence. Then, at the time his "release" was nearing, they figured out that he never served his time due to the clerical error, showed up and arrested him where he sits in jail and awaits a decision asking for his release/sentence.
What do you think? Is prison really a "rehabilitation" thing or a punishment? Should he still have to serve his 13 years after having allegedly "rehabilitating" himself, or doesn't that count?
Even the manager at Burger King, who was the victim of the robbery, thinks he should be set free.
I'm on the fence on this one. I see both sides.
Link with video:
www.today.com/news/m an-who-never-served- prison-sentence-cler ical-error-awai